[OSCTC-planning] Getting the diversity language right, on the new campus.openhatch.org
Asheesh Laroia
asheesh at asheesh.org
Tue Dec 31 06:53:07 UTC 2013
There's a new campus.openhatch.org, and I wanted to make sure that when we
talk about diversity in it, we explain why we care about diversity, so
readers know where we're coming from and feel comfortable.
To that end, here are the kind of things I want people to know:
* We have some success running gender-divers events. The first time we did
an event, it had >30% women. This trend has continued generally, that our
events have somewhat reasonably healthy gender diversity.
* Crucially, that 30% at Penn was more diversity than the CS program.
* We think lots of people are excited about open source, and want to find
their way in, and that the true demographics of that are close to the
demographics of the planet.
* We think that a key aspect of the reason open source is not as even,
demographically, as the planet right now is that knowledge and interest in
it typically spreads along friend network lines, and the starting-point is
very white and male and rich.
* We think women-in-CS organizations are neat. We like working with them
as a way to actively move toward the more-even demographics that we
believe match the underlying interest on the planet in open source.
* A lot of the reason we get reasonable gender diversity is the
newcomer-welcoming nature of our publicity for the events.
* Another thing is that it's not just the publicity, but the event itself,
that (intends to be|is) newcomer-friendly. Certainly parts of it are, and
we're committed to improving that iteratively over time. Like the
Practicing_Git section.
* We've been caring about newcomers in general since 2009, and we still
do, so if you don't particularly care about diversity, but you do care
about people being nice, we're still your pal.
I wrote some sample text for this here:
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/diverse-osctc
The idea is that my text would live above "Sponsors" but below "Friendly
and knowledgeable volunteers", in the same style as "Friendly and
knowledgeable volunteers".
I'm only sending this because I wanted to make sure that, as Shauna and I
both run out of steam and go to sleep, I serialized enough if the
conversation to disk so we can try to pick it up tomorrow. Happy to have
more voices here.
I realize that whatever we say here runs the risk of sounding like
tokenism <http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Tokenism> and doubly so for
carelessly-phrased things like the above. I'm hoping the conversation here
can occur in good faith. I'm happy to have people raise issue with word
choice or actions of ours and express how they feel; that's all part of a
good-faith conversation.
-- Asheesh.
More information about the OSCTC-planning
mailing list