[OH-Publicity] We Fail [was: Upcoming posts]
lists at asheesh.org
Mon Nov 19 01:26:08 UTC 2012
Excerpts from Mark Holmquist's message of Fri Nov 16 00:29:06 -0500 2012:
> > I'd love to do it, and I'd love to do it this weekend. Just....remind
> > me. I'm not currently very organized.
> I lied! I wrote a draft.
> Edit, add, remove, change, whatever! I'd love feedback over email, too.
Here are some thoughts!
I delivered some of these by IRC, but I thought it'd make sense to
In each section, I would indicate where we pass the tests, not just
which ones we fail. For example, added this to the section about
We have a web viewer on Github, and <a
for newcomers</a>, and we definitely haven't written our own source
again, there are some amusing semi-insane things that we don't do; you
don't have list 'em all. But I think it'd be good to give people a sense
of some of those, even if just to honor the semi-insanity of spot!
For example, for the "libraries" section we *do* use system libraries
where present... except for the dependencies we bundle. I'll leave it to
your discretion on if that's a violation. But check out the hilarity in
mysite/manage.py and vendor/__init__.py -- that masks any
system-installed versions of things in vendor/.
Similarly in "history," it'd be nice to indicate that we went all FLOSSy
after a few months of not sharing the source. I guess I want to publicly
shame us for not developing in the open from the get-go, but it might
have been the right decision. Anyway, people might be bemused to learn
that bit of history.
(Public release: https://openhatch.org/blog/2009/we-are-different/.
First commit: Thu Jun 4 2009, based on git log.)
(Admittely, we shared the source as soon as we went "out of beta" with
that blog post.)
Also, arguably, I included changelogs in the git tag message for the
releases we did do! Do check those out. The fact that they're hard to
discover might mean I get subtle but earned points of fail, though.
Oh, and for Chromium's full points of fail as of 2009:
. It might be nice to link to the real number of points they earned.
We should probably be nice and say they fixed a few of these issues, per
a blog post here:
...actually some of the comments about embedding sqlite are intriguing:
And wait a sec, I'm not sure that indicates any of these are fixed.
Anyway, Those are the things that I think would make this post totally
great. Let me know what you think, Mark!
More information about the Publicity