[OSCTC-planning] Moving forward on specific projects to have bugs lined up for Princeton project time

[Josh Matthews]

This is something Mozilla could probably do with some Firefox bugs, but I
fear that the initial 45-90 minutes build required would not fit well
within the event constraints. Am I correct?

Cheers,
Josh


On 20 November 2013 13:43, Asheesh Laroia <lists at asheesh.org> wrote:

> Hi all, and Shauna,
>
> I wanted to report on my progress getting specific projects to offer
> 2-5 good bitesize bugs each lined up for the Princeton event. (This is
> also known as "OpenHatch-affiliated projects". It's more than just
> having bugs lined up; it's having the bugs be truly good for
> newcomers, and having people from the projects be around during the
> event, and having enough supporting documentation so that the bugs can
> plausibly be solved.)
>
> I have a "basically definitely yes" from MissKat on #dreamwidth-dev
> for that project. (Also this is a person whom I had the pleasure of
> meeting at conferences.)
>
> I asked the SymPy folks on IRC.
>
> I pinged the d3 maintainer by private email.
>
> I asked the svg-edit people on their public mailing list.
>
> I documented this on the spreadsheet here:
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoHP1ey91UqPdGVDbmI4cnFOTmFEcUcwN3RiOTZMcUE#gid=0
>
> Question for you Shauna:
>
> I see "Thoughtworks" in the list. I am not sure what that refers to,
> so I thought I'd ping to indicate that confusion.
>
> Overall, thanks for making that spreadsheet. I will keep it updated as
> things progress with these projects.
>
> -- Asheesh.
> _______________________________________________
> OSCTC-planning mailing list
> OSCTC-planning at lists.openhatch.org
> http://lists.openhatch.org/mailman/listinfo/osctc-planning
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openhatch.org/pipermail/osctc-planning/attachments/20131120/22908dfe/attachment.html>