[OH-Dev] [issue991] Add 3 day verbiage to guide for people doing (code, etc.) reviews

[Lisa Hewus Fresh]

As a new person here, I don't really have an opinion with regard to the
inclusion of this text but this sentence should be re-worded:

" If you're interested in being the one to do so, but you know you need
more than 3 days is not long enough,
that is fine;"


Lisa Hewus Fresh


On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Asheesh Laroia <bugs at openhatch.org> wrote:

>
> New submission from Asheesh Laroia <asheesh at asheesh.org>:
>
> I suggested the following text, elsewhere:
>
> "To add an arbitrary (but perhaps useful for planning) time bounded-ness,
> is
> this addressing the above something you'd be interested in doing over the
> next 3
> days? If not, I can take care of it after that. If you're interested in
> being
> the one to do so, but you know you need more than 3 days is not long
> enough,
> that is fine; just say so, and we're happy to wait for you to perfect these
> changes."
>
> This is the kind of stock comment we can all leave on OpenHatch pull
> requests or
> bugs, when proposed patches/pull-requests require revision.
>
> If people like this, I encourage us to add this to the docs.
>
> ----------
> messages: 4353
> nosy: paulproteus
> priority: wish
> status: unread
> title: Add 3 day verbiage to guide for people doing (code, etc.) reviews
>
> __________________________________________
> Roundup issue tracker <bugs at openhatch.org>
> <https://openhatch.org/bugs/issue991>
> __________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.openhatch.org
> http://lists.openhatch.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openhatch.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140517/322d5e8e/attachment.html>