[Devel] Update on git mission!
Mark Freeman
mark at timewasted.net
Sat Apr 16 23:48:50 UTC 2011
I noticed this tracker entry by Paul. What if we saved the lessons on
using the Unix Shell and such for a dedicated mission? It seems to
make more sense to me to do that, versus trying to bolt it on to the
Git training mission that I am currently working on. See below:
New submission from palhmbs <paulbakulich at gmail.com>:
We really need to teach people basic bash skills.
Let's create an awesome mission to teach:
* Linux filesystem
* Grep
* Vi / Vim basics
* & your comments / additions totally appreciated.
Paul
----------
assignedto: palhmbs
messages: 1556
milestone: 0.11.04
nosy: palhmbs, paulproteus
priority: feature
status: chatting
title: Create new "Git Mission" for Terminal (cli/bash) skills
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Asheesh Laroia <asheesh at asheesh.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Mark Freeman wrote:
>
>> I don't have a publicly accessible repo, as I've been doing it all in a
>> local branch from a pull from the main openhatch one. I probably should have
>> just created a branch on gitorious and worked with it. I will next time.
>>
>> Here's a link to the plot progression (no sign in required):
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/16uZQWvvYWoWob2gjwCwqv24Wi9IRfllqCb5pw0oiu9c/edit?hl=en&authkey=CP2JvrIM
>
> Here is some early feedback. Some of it is "plot"-related feedback, which
> can maybe get touchy -- if you had an artistic angle you were pushing with
> the choices you made, then totally explain that in a reply and we'll figure
> out how to make sure your artistic vision shines through.
>
> * On the first page, you wrote "the inded audience". Maybe "intended
> audience"?
>
> * Second page: You're asking people to read the code comments to find the
> author of something, but that's confusing because "git log" and "git
> annotate" (AKA "git blame") are the more common tools for finding the author
> of some code. Maybe you could ask them to do something different, like paste
> the output of the program?
>
> Also, people have suggested we explain to people they need to "cd" into a
> directory, or open a particular file with a text editor -- whatever you ask
> people to do, it should only be unclear if that's what you want. We can't
> necessarily assume much of the skill level of people running through these
> missions.
>
> * Third page: I would link to the diff/patch mission in the text, and also
> have a paragraph like:
>
> "Files created by git format-patch are like normal patch files, but they
> also carry information about the git commit that created the patch: the
> author, the date, and the commit log message are all there at the top of the
> patch."
>
> Also, you don't explain here how to "check your changes into your local
> copy".
>
> Also, if the person is an OS X user, we could suggest they creating the
> patch with GitX, or with gitg in GNU/Linux-y systems.
>
> Also, "open the patch file" in what?
>
> * Dinner party:
>
> That would be awesome.
>
> --
> -- Asheesh.
>
> http://asheesh.org/
>
> Q: How many Martians does it take to screw in a light bulb?
> A: One and a half.
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.openhatch.org
> http://lists.openhatch.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
More information about the Devel
mailing list